Not a diamond; appears to be industrial slag glass, quartz crystal, or quartz composite material based on the conchoidal fractures, flow lines, and amorphous surface texturing.

Not a diamond; appears to be industrial slag glass, quartz crystal, or quartz composite material based on the conchoidal fractures, flow lines, and amorphous surface texturing. · Rough crystal / Raw amorphous chunk with no standard faceted gemstone shape.

Not applicable (raw, uncut, unpolished material). Cut

Not a diamond; appears to be industrial slag glass, quartz crystal, or quartz composite material based on the conchoidal fractures, flow lines, and amorphous surface texturing. - Rough crystal / Raw amorphous chunk with no standard faceted gemstone shape.

Carat

Estimated at approximately 15 to 25 carats equivalent weight (by volume, assuming quartz or glass density).

Color

Light greenish-gray / translucent smoky gray with iridescent surface sheens.

Clarity

I3 / Heavily included with internal fractures, stress lines, and debris inclusions.

Shape

Rough crystal / Raw amorphous chunk with no standard faceted gemstone shape.

Overall Assessment

This specimen is positively identified as not being a diamond. Its physical characteristics (conchoidal fracture lines, lack of adamantine luster, amorphous texture) point toward industrial glass slag or a raw quartz crystal specimen.

Cut Quality

Not applicable (raw, uncut, unpolished material).

Brilliance

Poor to minimal due to lack of facet geometry and high internal opacity.

Fire

Negligible spectral dispersion.

Scintillation

Poor; surface reflections only, no internal light return pattern.

Proportions

Irregular raw specimen dimensions; no standard pavilion, crown, or table angles.

Symmetry

Asymmetrical raw formation.

Polish

Unpolished, highly textured natural or fracture-plane surface.

Fluorescence

Indeterminate without UV testing equipment, likely inert.

Inclusions

Widespread internal fracturing, bubbles (if glass), and mineral veiling.

Blemishes

Heavy surface scratching, conchoidal chip marks, and textural weathering.

Origin

Likely synthetic/industrial origin (if glass slag) or common hydrothermal origin (if raw quartz).

Treatment Detection

Natural raw state with no advanced gemstone enhancement treatments detected.

Estimated Value

Nominal decorative or specimen value (under $20 USD).

Certification Estimate

Gemological laboratories such as GIA or IGI would not certify this as diamond; would issue a report identifying it as non-gem material or glass/quartz.

Investment Potential

None; holds no monetary or investment value as a gemstone.

Similar Diamonds

None; this specimen shares no optical or physical properties with gem-grade diamonds.

Setting Suggestions

Not suitable for standard fine jewelry settings; could be wire-wrapped as a raw mineral specimen pendant.

Care & Maintenance

Standard cleaning with mild soap and warm water; avoid harsh impacts as the material is brittle and heavily fractured.

Interesting Facts

The conchoidal fracture patterns visible on the surface strongly resemble materials like obsidian or industrial cullet glass rather than crystalline carbon.

Identified on 8/25/2026
Not a diamond; appears to be industrial slag glass, quartz crystal, or quartz composite material based on the conchoidal fractures, flow lines, and amorphous surface texturing. Rough crystal / Raw amorphous chunk with no standard faceted gemstone shape. | Diamond Identifier