The specimen does not appear to be a diamond; it exhibits characteristics of glass or a silicate mineral such as quartz or beryl. The conchoidal fracture patterns and lack of adamant crystalline structure suggest a non-diamond material.

The specimen does not appear to be a diamond; it exhibits characteristics of glass or a silicate mineral such as quartz or beryl. The conchoidal fracture patterns and lack of adamant crystalline structure suggest a non-diamond material. · Rough / Uncut / Irregular Shard

None (Raw/Uncut specimen) Cut

The specimen does not appear to be a diamond; it exhibits characteristics of glass or a silicate mineral such as quartz or beryl. The conchoidal fracture patterns and lack of adamant crystalline structure suggest a non-diamond material. - Rough / Uncut / Irregular Shard

Carat

Estimated 2.0 - 5.0 carats based on visual size relative to finger.

Color

Colorless with iridescent surface films

Clarity

Translucent with significant internal veining (corresponds to I3 if compared to diamond standards)

Shape

Rough / Uncut / Irregular Shard

Overall Assessment

This item is highly unlikely to be a diamond. It lacks the isometric crystal habit of industrial diamond and displays conchoidal (shell-like) fracturing consistent with glass or silicon dioxide.

Cut Quality

None (Raw/Uncut specimen)

Brilliance

Very Low; lacks internal reflection due to absence of faceting.

Fire

Observed iridescence on surface (thin-film interference) rather than internal spectral dispersion.

Scintillation

None

Proportions

N/A - This is a rough fragment with no geometric facets.

Symmetry

Poor / Asymmetrical

Polish

Natural surface; no mechanical polish.

Fluorescence

Indeterminable from static image; likely none.

Inclusions

Heavy internal fractures, cleavage planes, and fluid-like inclusions.

Blemishes

External dirt, conchoidal chips, and surface abrasions.

Origin

Terrestrial mineral or anthropogenic (man-made glass shard).

Treatment Detection

None detected; appears to be raw waste material or natural low-grade mineral.

Estimated Value

Minimal decorative value ($0.50 - $5.00), assuming it is a glass fragment or common quartz.

Certification Estimate

Likely uncertifiable as a diamond by GIA/IGI; would be identified as glass or mineral specimen.

Investment Potential

None; lacks the rarity or physical properties of gemstone-grade material.

Similar Diamonds

Rough industrial Boart or low-quality quartz crystals.

Setting Suggestions

Wire wrapping for decorative/novelty purposes only.

Care & Maintenance

Avoid high heat or pressure as internal fractures make it prone to shattering.

Interesting Facts

The rainbow effect seen on the surface is likely due to 'Tarnish' or a thin layer of oxidation/oil on a fracture plane.

Identified on 5/9/2026
The specimen does not appear to be a diamond; it exhibits characteristics of glass or a silicate mineral such as quartz or beryl. The conchoidal fracture patterns and lack of adamant crystalline structure suggest a non-diamond material. Rough / Uncut / Irregular Shard | Diamond Identifier