Natural rough or heavily included crystal, appearing more like a low-grade industrial diamond, quartz, or chalcedony due to extreme opaqueness and dark inclusions, but evaluated as a diamond raw specimen for analysis.

Natural rough or heavily included crystal, appearing more like a low-grade industrial diamond, quartz, or chalcedony due to extreme opaqueness and dark inclusions, but evaluated as a diamond raw specimen for analysis. · Irregular round / rounded rough crystal with primitive native facets or polishing attempts

Poor / Rough uncertified stone with uneven primitive faceting Cut

Natural rough or heavily included crystal, appearing more like a low-grade industrial diamond, quartz, or chalcedony due to extreme opaqueness and dark inclusions, but evaluated as a diamond raw specimen for analysis. - Irregular round / rounded rough crystal with primitive native facets or polishing attempts

Carat

Estimated 1.5 - 2.5 carats based on visual scale against fingers

Color

Milky white / translucent with a dark central inclusion (I1 to I3 or Industrial grade equivalent)

Clarity

I3 (Included - highly visible dark knot or inclusion near the surface)

Shape

Irregular round / rounded rough crystal with primitive native facets or polishing attempts

Overall Assessment

This specimen represents a low-grade, heavily included rough stone with significant opacity and a prominent dark inclusion. While fascinating as a raw mineral sample, it lacks the optical properties required for traditional fine jewelry use.

Cut Quality

Poor / Rough uncertified stone with uneven primitive faceting

Brilliance

Very low due to opacity, milkiness, and heavy inclusions

Fire

Minimal to none, masked by the translucent body color and internal clouding

Scintillation

Extremely limited due to lack of proper faceting and high degree of internal inclusion

Proportions

Non-standard proportions, deep and irregular bulk shape

Symmetry

Poor, highly asymmetric natural rough form

Polish

Poor, matte to translucent waxy luster with rough surface texture

Fluorescence

Cannot be determined accurately without UV light testing, likely inert or faint

Inclusions

Prominent dark inclusion/knot near the edge, extensive internal cloudiness and feathering

Blemishes

Natural surface pits, minor abrasions, and uneven texture

Origin

Likely alluvial or primary kimberlite rough source, unverified

Treatment Detection

No obvious signs of artificial treatments; appears completely untreated and natural

Estimated Value

Nominal value (under $50) as an industrial specimen or mineral sample rather than a gemstone

Certification Estimate

Not viable for standard grading labs like GIA or AGS for jewelry; would receive an industrial or rough sorting classification

Investment Potential

None as a gemstone; purely a mineral specimen curiosity

Similar Diamonds

Low-grade industrial bort or unpolished low-quality diamond rough

Setting Suggestions

Not recommended for fine jewelry due to heavy inclusions and lack of durability; better suited for mineral collections or wire-wrapped organic/raw jewelry if securely mounted

Care & Maintenance

Handle with care to prevent chipping around the inclusion area; clean gently with warm soapy water and a soft brush

Interesting Facts

Most mined diamonds (roughly 80%) are of industrial grade rather than gem quality, often used for cutting, grinding, and drilling tools

Identified on 9/3/2026