Indeterminate (Visual only, appears most similar to Cubic Zirconia or low-grade Lab-Grown)

Indeterminate (Visual only, appears most similar to Cubic Zirconia or low-grade Lab-Grown) · Square (appears to be a Princess cut or similar square modified brilliant)

Good (symmetry appears slightly off, with sharp edges typical of a machine-cut stone) Cut

Indeterminate (Visual only, appears most similar to Cubic Zirconia or low-grade Lab-Grown) - Square (appears to be a Princess cut or similar square modified brilliant)

Carat

Estimated 0.50 - 0.75 carats based on relative size to fabric texture

Color

G-H range (appears white but with a slight cool/greyish undertone in this lighting)

Clarity

VS2 - SI1 range (visible inclusions are not prominent at this distance, but high-texture appearance suggests internal graining)

Shape

Square (appears to be a Princess cut or similar square modified brilliant)

Overall Assessment

The stone appears to be a commercial-grade square-cut simulant or low-quality lab diamond. While it has a pleasing square silhouette, its light performance and fire are consistent with mass-produced stones rather than investment-grade natural diamonds.

Cut Quality

Good (symmetry appears slightly off, with sharp edges typical of a machine-cut stone)

Brilliance

Moderate; shows some white light return but lacks the depth of high-index refraction

Fire

Moderate; limited spectral dispersion visible in the flash photography

Scintillation

Low to Moderate; pattern lacks the crisp light-dark contrast found in high-grade diamonds

Proportions

High table percentage observed; depths and angles appear standard for commercial-grade square cuts

Symmetry

Fair to Good (the corners and facets lack the precision of a top-tier cut)

Polish

Fair (surface shows significant light bounce which may hide minor abrasions)

Fluorescence

Indeterminate without UV light (no strong blue visible under flash)

Inclusions

Possible cloudiness or internal graining visible in center facets

Blemishes

Minor surface dust and potential facet edge wear

Origin

Likely synthetic/manufactured given the context and appearance

Treatment Detection

None visible; appearance is consistent with as-grown or as-manufactured materials

Estimated Value

$20 - $150 (depending on material; if CZ, value is negligible; if lab-grown, value is on the lower end)

Certification Estimate

Likely uncertified commercially sourced stone; if submitted, IGI/GIA would likely give a 'Good' cut grade

Investment Potential

Low; small square-cut stones of lower clarity/cut grades do not typically appreciate in value

Similar Diamonds

Commercial-grade small princess cut stones found in budget retail jewelry

Setting Suggestions

Four-prong solitaire setting in 14k white gold or sterling silver to protect corners

Care & Maintenance

Clean regularly with warm soapy water and a soft brush to maintain surface luster

Interesting Facts

Princess cuts were created in the 1960s and 70s to maximize the yield from square rough crystals.

Identified on 5/21/2026
Indeterminate (Visual only, appears most similar to Cubic Zirconia or low-grade Lab-Grown) Square (appears to be a Princess cut or similar square modified brilliant) | Diamond Identifier